Negative 0 eosinophil

Grade 1 (<10 eosinophils /HPF) 

Grade 2 (11-20 eosinophils /HPF) 

Grade 3 (>20 eosinophils /HPF).

The research encompassed 30 cases of OSCC, comprising 17 cases (56.6%) of well-differentiated OSCC, 10 cases (33.3%) of moderately differentiated OSCC, and 3 cases (10%) of poorly differentiated OSCC. 

The mean age of the cases was 53 years (25y-75y) with majority of them being males (21 cases). The most common site of the lesion was buccal mucosa, followed by tongue, lip, alveolus and retromolar region. 

Most of the OSCC cases were ulcero-proliferative type with mean maximum dimension of 6.85cm. The TATE was observed in 24 instances (80%) and was negative in 6 instances (20%). The histological grade of OSCC was statistically significant with different grades of TATE (p = 0.037) [Table. 1].

Well differentiated OSCC showed greater levels of TATE when compared to PD-SCC. Whereas no association was found between tumor size, depth of invasion, worst pattern of invasion and lymph node metastasis with different grades of TATE.

Among the patients, 22 had tobacco chewing habit, 3 alcoholics, 1 had both the habits and 4 patients had no such habits. 

The most commonly involved site was buccal mucosa with other sites in descending order includes: Tongue>Lip>Alveolus/Retromolar trigone.

2 types of lesions were observed, ulceroproliferative and exophytic, with ulceroproliferative being more frequent. 

Eosinophils (granulocytic leukocytes) are myeloid precursors that are regulated by cytokines such as IL-3, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, stem cell factor, IL-5, and various transcription factors.  Mature Eosinophils, after circulating for 3 to 18 hours, migrate to the tissue, especially GIT, and under the influence of chemoattractants, they are recruited to the site of inflammation[10, 13].

TATE, also seen in other tumors like: TATE, in breast carcinoma (uncommon), is linked to high mutation or neoantigen load, but less cytologic immune activity[4, 5]. TATE, in colorectal carcinoma, eosinophils kills tumor cells directly and by anti-tumor immunity, linking to good prognosis[11].

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, TATE demonstrates a distinct behavior compared to other tumors, as eosinophils, which typically exhibit anti-tumor activity in other contexts, seem to play a tumor-promoting role in this case. This is primarily achieved through their induction of angiogenesis and metastasis[14].

Eosinophils demonstrate a dual role in tumor development and progression. On one hand, they exert anti-tumoral effects by releasing cytotoxic proteins such as eosinophil cationic protein and major basic protein, which can directly damage tumor cells. Additionally, eosinophils enhance tumor immunity by recruiting cytotoxic T-cells and natural killer cells. Conversely, eosinophils may also promote tumor progression through secretion of growth factors and pro-angiogenic mediators that facilitate tumor invasion and metastasis.

In many tumors, eosinophils support anti-tumor immunity by helping immune cells attack cancer, but under some conditions, they promote tumor growth[10]. Overall, TATE is associated with better survival, but not disease-free survival[3].

In this study, TATE was observed in 80% of the cases, with a significant association found between higher eosinophil counts and well-differentiated tumors (p = 0.037) This aligns with previous literature suggesting that eosinophilic infiltration may reflect a host immune response contributing to tumor suppression in well-differentiated carcinomas. The findings support the hypothesis that eosinophils may play a beneficial role in tumor immunity by releasing cytotoxic granules, chemokines, and cytokines that target tumor cells[12].

Similar findings were reported by Hosseinzadeh et al. (2024)[12], who observed that higher eosinophil infiltration was associated with well-differentiated OSCC, suggesting a potential role of eosinophils in tumor immune surveillance. Likewise, Choudhury et al. (2022)[7] demonstrated that tissue eosinophilia may reflect host immune response against tumor progression, although its association with metastatic potential remains inconsistent across studies.

Although higher grades of TATE were numerically more frequent in larger tumors (>4 cm), this association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.15). This trend may reflect increased immune cell recruitment within larger tumor microenvironments, but studies with large number of cases are required to confirm this observation.

Moreover, eosinophils may participate in the recruitment and activation of other immune cells, enhancing the antitumor immune response[2]. Interestingly, no significant correlation was found between TATE and other prognostic parameters such as tumor size, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, or worst pattern of invasion[4]. This suggests that while TATE may reflect tumor differentiation, it may not be a reliable marker for tumor aggressiveness or metastatic potential. Discrepancies across studies regarding the prognostic role of TATE may stem from variations in sample size, methodology, and histological grading systems.