• P-ISSN 2394-9481 E-ISSN 2394-949X
  • Before December 2023, article status/review can be accessed using old submissions tab

Journal of Medical Sciences and Health

Journal of Medical Sciences and Health

Year: 2025, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 321-326

Original Article

Cytological Study of Thyroid Lesions using the Bethesda System and Histopathological Correlation

Received Date:31 December 2024, Accepted Date:17 February 2025, Published Date:14 November 2025

Abstract

Introduction: The first line of investigation for diagnosis and follow up of patients with thyroid disorder is fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as it is minimally invasive, cost effective and relatively accurate procedure. Classification of thyroid lesions based on The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) helps in better understanding of the borderline cases where decision of surgical intervention over medical management is crucial. Aim and objectives: To classify the thyroid lesions according to The Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology and to correlate cytological diagnosis with histopathological diagnosis. 
Material and methods: This was an observational study of 101 consecutive cases of thyroid FNACs received in the Department of Pathology. Previously operated cases were excluded from the study. Papanicolaou, Hematoxylin & Eosin, and Giemsa stained slides and reports of FNAC were taken and classified according to TBSRTC. Histopathological reports of the available cases were taken and correlated with cytological diagnosis. 
Results: A total of 101consecutive cases of thyroid fine needle aspirations were studied. Most common thyroid lesion encountered was Category II benign (66.34 %, 67cases) followed by Category IV (8.91%, 9cases) and Category I (8.91%, 9cases) and least common were suspicious for malignancy (4.95%, 5cases) and positive for malignancy (4.95%, 5cases). 17cases (16.83%) were available for comparison with histopathology among which 76.47% (13cases) were concordant and 23.53% (4cases) were discordant. 
Conclusion: FNAC is a simple, safe diagnostic modality for detecting thyroid disease and has a good diagnostic accuracy with histopathology in detecting malignant thyroid lesions using The Bethesda System.

Introduction

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is minimally invasive, cost effective, relatively accurate procedure and hence the first line of investigation 1 . FNAC helps in identifying benign and malignant lesions of thyroid. Various terminologies used in reporting have created confusion among surgeons, endocrinologists and radiologists. To resolve the confusion and to standardize the reporting system National Cancer Institute (NCI) proposed TBSRTC 1 . Classification based on The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) helps in better understanding of the borderline cases where decision of surgical intervention over medical management is crucial 2 .

Aim and Objectives

  1. To classify the thyroid lesions according to The Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

  2. To correlate cytological diagnosis with histopathological diagnosis.

Material and Methods

This was an observational study of 101 consecutive cases of thyroid FNACs received in the Department of Pathology. Previously operated cases were excluded from the study. Papanicolaou, Hematoxylin & Eosin (H & E) and Giemsa stained slides & reports of FNAC were taken and classified according to TBSRTC. Histopathological reports of the available cases were taken and correlated with cytological diagnosis. Collected data was analysed statistically using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. The results were expressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, xpressed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy.

Results

A total of 101 consecutive cases of thyroid fine needle aspirations were studied. The cases were distributed from 13-80 years, maximum number of cases in 31-40 years & 41-50 years, minimum number of cases in 10-20 years, median age of 42 years. Male: Female ratio 1:5.7 with female predominance (Table 1). Most common thyroid lesion was Category II benign (66.3 %, 67 cases) followed by Category IV (9.9 %, 10 cases) and least common were suspicious of malignancy and malignancy (5 %, 5 cases each) (Table 2 and Figure 1).

Table 1: Age and gender distribution

Age

Gender

Total

Female

Male

10-20

2(2.3%)

0(0.0%)

2(2.0%)

21-30

16(18.6%)

3(20.0%)

19(18.8%)

31-40

25(29.1%)

1(6.7%)

26(25.7%)

41-50

21(24.4%)

5(33.3%)

26(25.7%)

51-60

12(14.0%)

2(13.3%)

14(13.9%)

>60

10(11.6%)

4(26.7%)

14(13.9%)

Total

86(100.0%)

15(100.0%)

101(100.0%)

Table 2: Distribution according to The Bethesda System of classification

Bethesda Category

No. of cases

1

8 (7.9%)

2

67 (66.3%)

3

6 (5.9%)

4

10 (9.9%)

5

5 (5.0%)

6

5 (5.0%)

Total

101 (100.0%)

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a254c2a5-bc89-43c6-a70e-76057e70a96eimage1.png
Figure 1: Graphical representation of distribution of cases according to The Bethesda System of classification

Cytological and histopathological images of few of the cases are depicted in Figure 2Figure 3Figure 4. Statistical analysis showed sensitivity 60%, specificity 83.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) 60%, negative predictive value (NPV) 83.3% and accuracy 76.47% with Χ2 value 3.149 and p value 0.074 indicating there is no significant difference between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. Out of the total cases, only 17 cases (16.83%) were available for comparison with histopathology among which 76.47% (13 cases) were concordant and 23.53% (4 cases) were discordant (Table 3).

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a254c2a5-bc89-43c6-a70e-76057e70a96eimage2.png
Figure 2: TBSRTC Category III on cytology (a: H & E, high power view) proved to be multinodular goiter on histopathology (b: H & E, low power view)
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a254c2a5-bc89-43c6-a70e-76057e70a96eimage3.png
Figure 3: TBSRTC Category IV on cytology (a: H & E, high power view) proved to be adenomatoid nodule on histopathology (b: H & E, low power view)
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/a254c2a5-bc89-43c6-a70e-76057e70a96eimage4.png
Figure 4: TBSRTC Category VI on cytology (a: high powerview) proved to be papillary carcinoma thyroid on histopathology (b: H & E, low power view)
Table 3: Distribution according to cytopathology (FNAC) and histopathological examination (HPE)

FNAC

HPE

Total

Malignant

Benign

Malignant

3

2

5

Benign

2

10

12

Total

5

12

17

ᵡ² =3.19, p=0.074, Sensitivity =60%, Specificity = 83.3%, Positive predictive value (PPV) = 60%, Negative predictive value (NPV) =83.3%, Diagnostic accuracy (Concordant cases) = 76.47%, Discordant cases=23.53%.

 

Discussion

FNAC is the most effective, safe, rapid, economically feasible test & first line diagnostic test to evaluate thyroid nodules. Different diagnostic criteria & terminologies used by various pathologists leads to confusion among surgeons, endocrinologists and radiologists to interpret the cytopathology report.

A thyroid fine needle aspiration sample is considered adequate for evaluation if it contains at least six groups of well-visualized follicular epithelial cells (i.e., well stained, well preserved, undistorted, and unobstructed) with a minimum of ten cells per group. These six groups of ten follicular cells may be present on a single slide or distributed across multiple slides for adequacy assessment. These criteria apply to all cytologic preparations including conventional smears and liquid-based samples 3.

TBSRTC includes six diagnostic categories: (I) Non diagnostic or Unsatisfactory, (II) Benign, (III) Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), (IV) follicular neoplasm (FN) or suspicious for a FN, (V) Suspicious for malignancy (SM) and (VI) Positive for malignancy 1 .

Alternate names for 3 of the diagnostic categories (I/unsatisfactory, III/follicular lesion of undetermined significance, and IV/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm) have been eliminated to avoid confusion 4.

TBSRTC 2023 continues to advise using the category names and optionally, their corresponding category numbers, e.g. benign (Bethesda II), follicular neoplasm (Bethesda IV) 4.

The age and gender distribution in our study showed more cases in 31-40 years and 41-50 years with female preponderance which is consistent with studies done by Jamaiyar et al5, Doley et al 6 and Urvashi Gohil et al. 7

In our study, the most common thyroid lesion was Category II benign (66.3 %, 67 cases) followed by Category IV (9.9%, 10 cases). Similar results were found in Nandedkar et al 8 , Neethu et al 9 and Yang et al. 10 . Category II was most common in other studies done by Choden et al 11 and Mishra et al.12 (Table 4).

Table 4: Comparison of frequencies of different Bethesda categories in various studies

BETHESDA Category

Present study

Nandedkar et al 8

Neethu et al 9

Yang et al 10

Choden et al 11

Mishra et al 12

1

7.9%

4.29%

4%

10.4%

6%

5.41%

2

66.3%

82.67%

82%

64.6%

82%

84.23%

3

5.9%

0.82%

2.4%

3.2%

1.4%

1.97%

4

9.9%

9.07%

5.4%

11.6%

3.8%

3.45%

5

5.0%

1.15%

1.7%

2.6%

2.4%

1%

6

5.0%

1.98%

4.5%

7.6%

4.4%

4%

In the present study, we found sensitivity by FNAC to be 60%, the specificity was 83.3%, the PPV was 60%, NPV was 83.3% and accuracy to be 76.47%. This could be due to non-aspiration technique followed in the institution to minimize hemorrhagic aspirates and to obtain adequate cellularity. Available clinical history, radiological and/or biochemical investigations were correlated before cytological reporting contributed to high diagnostic accuracy.

Several studies have documented the sensitivity of FNAC in thyroid nodules to range from 50-88.4%, specificity from 73.7 to 100%, PPV from 70-99%, NPV from 66.3-98.4%, and accuracy from 67.2-97%. 913141516171819 So, the results of the present study are fairly comparable to other studies (Table 5).

Table 5: Comparison of results in different studies

Parameters

Present study

Neethu et al 9

Pandey et al 13

Morgan et al 14

Ko et al 15

Jogai et al 16

Cai et al 17

Bamanikar et al 18

Ergete et al 19

Sensitivity

60%

52%

57.14%

55%

78.4%

88.4%

83.3%

50%

67%

Specificity

83.3%

97%

90%

73.7%

98.2%

99.1%

98%

100%

84.7%

PPV

60%

85%

70.58%

70%

99%

-

71.4%

-

-

NPV

83.3%

89%

83.33%

67.4%

66.3%

-

98.4%

-

-

Accuracy

76.47%

88.9%

80.28%

67.2%

84.4%

78.1%

97%

94.2%

82%

Out of total 101 consecutive thyroid FNACs, there were 17 cases (16.83%) available for comparison with histopathology among which 76.47% (13 cases) were concordant and 23.53% (4 cases) were discordant. The discordant cases in our study are depicted in Table 6.

 

 

 

Table 6: Discordant cases in our study

Sl no.

Cytological diagnosis

Histopathological diagnosis

1

Suspicious for Follicular Neoplasm

Adenomatoid nodule in a nodular goitre

2

Atypia of undetermined significance

Multinodular Goiter

3

Nodular goitre with secondary changes

Multinodular goitre with incidental Papillary Microcarcinoma

4

Lymphocytic Thyroiditis

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

In first case, aspirate showed highly cellular smear comprised of follicular epithelial cells arranged predominantly in micro follicular pattern, monolayered sheets & clusters few clusters show mild anisonucleosis and nuclear overlapping, but histopathological examination revealed predominantly benign follicles with no papillary/ psammoma bodies indicating adenomatoid nodule in a nodular goitre.

In second case, aspirate was hemorrhagic, paucicellular with plenty of cyst macrophages with thick & thin colloid, lymphocytes in proteinaceous background. Histopathological examination showed cystically dilated follicles with papillary projections indicating multinodular goitre. In this case paucicellularity, obscuring hemorrhagic background had led to discordance.

In third case, aspirate was moderately cellular with few cells showing mild anisonucleosis, nuclear overlapping, many hemosiderin laden macrophages, and lymphocytic infiltration amidst the follicular epithelial cells in thin colloid background. Histological examination showed benign nodules with few showing cystic dilation, areas of haemorrhage with hemosiderin laden macrophages, foci of calcification and a focal encapsulated lesion having follicular cells arranged in papillary pattern with ground glass appearance of nuclei indicating multinodular goitre with incidental papillary microcarcinoma. The fine needle used for aspiration overshot the area of papillary microcarcinoma in this case resulting in discordance.

In fourth case, aspirate was hemorrhagic with polymorphous population of lymphoid cells with few occasional epithelioid cells. Histopathological examination showed complete effacement of thyroid parenchyma by lymphoid infiltration comprised of heterogenous B cells such as atypical small lymphocytes, centrocytes, immunoblasts, and plasma cells with occasional Hurthle cell metaplasia indicating Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. FNAC with flow cytometric immunophenotyping and immunohistochemistry in suspected cases of lymphocytic thyroiditis would aid in definitive diagnosis of lymphoma 4.

The results of our study and previous studies show high sensitivity and specificity of FNAC in diagnosis of thyroid lesions. Performing FNAC in clinically suspected malignancy cases helps to rule out malignancy and to know the prognosis to improve quality of medical care.

Limitation: Cytopathologically proven malignant cases were referred to a higher centre for further treatment, as a result of which many cases were lost to follow-up. Adequate sampling reduces false-negative results in thyroid assessments.

Conclusion

FNAC is a simple and safe diagnostic modality for detecting thyroid disease. We found that FNAC has good diagnostic accuracy with histopathology in detecting malignant thyroid lesions using the Bethesda system. Paucicellularity can be corrected through repeat aspiration. For repeat aspirations, ultrasound guidance with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is preferred to ensure adequacy. In the absence of ROSE, obtaining a minimum of three separate samples from the nodule can reduce the occurrence of unsatisfactory specimens.

Disclosure

Funding: Nil

Conflict of Interest: Nil

References

  1. Prathima S, Suresh TN, Kumar MLH, Bhaskaran A. Impact of the Bethesda System in Reporting Thyroid CytopathologyThyroid Research and Practice2016;13(1):914. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-0354.168900
  2. Cibas ES, Ali SZ. NCI Thyroid FNA state of the science conference. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathologyAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology2009;132(5):658665. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpphlwmi3jv4la
  3. Ali SZ, Vanderlan PA. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (3). (pp. 11-279Springer. 2023.
  4. Bychkov A, Jung CK. What’s new in thyroid pathology 2024: updates from the new WHO classification and bethesda systemJournal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2024;58(2):98101. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2024.03.06
  5. Jamaiyar A, Yogesh K. How accurate is fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for thyroid lesion: A correlation of FNAC with histopathologyJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2023;12(1):1520. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1413_21
  6. Doley P, Chikkannaiah P, Venkataramanappa S. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Thyroid Lesions Using Bethesda Classification and Histopathological CorrelationMedical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth2023;16(6):856863. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_300_22
  7. Malukani K, Nandedkar SS, Dixit M, Varma AV, Gambhir S. Evaluation of thyroid lesions by fine-needle aspiration cytology according to bethesda system and its histopathological correlationInternational Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research2018;8(2):7682. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_169_17
  8. Banik A, Neethu GV, Preethi CR, Nikethan B. Cytohistological correlation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology with emphasis on discordant cases: A tertiary care center studyIndian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU)2023;16(2):259263. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_488_22
  9. Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, Wasserman PG. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: A study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlationsCancer2007;111(5):306315. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22955
  10. Pandey P, Dixit A, Mahajan N. Fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid: A cytohistologic correlation with critical evaluation of discordant casesThyroid Research and Practice2012;9(2):3239. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-0354.96026
  11. Morgan JL, Serpell JW, Cheng MSP. Fine‐needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: how useful is it? ANZ Journal of Surgery2003;73(7):480483. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-1433.2003.02670.x
  12. Ko HM, Jhu IK, Yang SH, Lee JH, Nam JH, Juhng SW. Clinicopathologic analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid. A review of 1,613 cases and correlation with histopathologic diagnosesActa Cytologica2003;47(5):727732. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1159/000326596
  13. Jogai S, Al-Jassar A, Temmim L, Dey P, Adesina AO, Amanguno HG. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid: A cytohistologic study with evaluation of discordant casesActa Cytologica2005;49(5):483488. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1159/000326192
  14. Cai XJ, Valiyaparambath N, Nixon P, Waghorn A, Giles T, Helliwell T. Ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodulesCytopathology2006;17(5):251256. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00397.x
  15. Bamanikar S, Bamanikar A, Jadhav S, Jadhav P, Kumar H, Soraisham P. Cyto-histology and clinical correlation of thyroid gland lesions: A 3 year study in a tertiary hospitalClinical Cancer Investigation Journal2014;3(3):208212. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2278-0513.132112
  16. Ergete W, Abebe D. Discordant rate between thyroid Fine needle aspiration cytology and histopathologic diagnosisEthiopian Journal of Health Development2002;16(2):227231. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejhd.v16i2.9815

DON'T MISS OUT!

Subscribe now for latest articles and news.