Journal of Medical Sciences and Health

Introduction

Pryce first described the term pulmonary sequestration (1946)[1], classifying it into two types [Table. 1][1, 2]. It is an uncommon congenital lung malformation which has a non-functioning lung segment that is devoid of normal trachea-bronchial communication and receives its arterial supply from a separate abnormal systemic artery. Clinically, intralobar sequestration most often presents in childhood or early adulthood (typically before 20 years of age)[1, 2] with recurrent pneumonia involving the same pulmonary segment. Additional presentations include fever, persistent productive cough, hemoptysis, dyspnoea and chest or back discomfort. 

A minority of patients are asymptomatic, and the anomaly is identified incidentally. However, incidental detection in the elderly is exceedingly uncommon and may pose a significant diagnostic challenge[2-4]. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice, with generally favourable outcomes[3]. We report a rare case of an incidentally discovered intralobar pulmonary sequestration in an elderly male.

Case Description

A 70-year-old male presented with complaints of generalised weakness and intermittent exertional dyspnoea for past four years. There was no associated fever or cough. He suffered pulmonary tuberculosis four years ago but was a treatment defaulter (left ATT after one month). Routine laboratory investigations did not show any significant abnormality except anaemia. There was no history of any co-morbidity, addiction, major surgical illness, hemoptysis, or recurrent chest infections. A chest radiograph was done for further evaluation.

The chest radiograph [Fig. 1] revealed heterogeneous opacification involving the left mid and lower lung zones associated with fibrobronchiectatic changes, irregular architectural distortion and upward deviation of the left hilum. The left hemithorax had features of volume loss, including mediastinal and tracheal shift towards the left, crowding of ribs and elevated left hemidiaphragm. Fibrobronchiectatic changes were noted in the right mid zone. Homogeneous opacity was seen in the right lower zone, obscuring the right hemidiaphragm medially; differential considerations included consolidation or a lung mass.

The CECT Chest demonstrated a well-defined heterogeneous soft tissue density lesion measuring 9.9x7x3.9 cm (APxTRxCC) in the anterior basal segment of right lower lobe extending to the diaphragmatic pleural surface ([Fig. 2]A). Few internal calcific foci were seen. The lesion showed no significant post-contrast enhancement, and no bronchial communication was identified. Notably, the lesion showed systemic arterial supply with the feeding artery (2-3 mm in diameter) arising from the right renal artery and coursing superolaterally. The venous drainage was into the right superior pulmonary vein. Also, it demonstrated focal hypervascularity (likely due to systemic perfusion). These vascular features were more clearly delineated on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, facilitating accurate characterization of the lesion ([Fig. 2]B, C). Based on the above imaging findings, a diagnosis of intralobar pulmonary sequestration was established. Additional findings included fibrobronchiectatic changes involving bilateral upper and left lower lobes, predominantly affecting the left upper lobe, along with left lung volume loss [Fig. 3], likely sequelae to old infection. As the patient remained clinically stable and exhibited no significant symptoms attributable to the sequestration, surgical management was deferred, and he was discharged with a plan for scheduled follow-up. 

Discussion

Incidental detection of pulmonary sequestration in the elderly is rare and may pose a significant diagnostic challenge[3]. This case highlights that meticulous evaluation of the characteristic imaging findings of pulmonary sequestration enables confident diagnosis and helps to avoid misinterpretation (see [Fig. 4], Flowchart). 

On imaging, pulmonary sequestration usually appears as a lower-lobe consolidation or mass. It can also manifest as focal atelectasis, cyst, bronchiectasis, or a well-defined lesion containing air–fluid levels. The differential diagnoses include persistent pneumonia, congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM), bronchogenic cyst, pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, Scimitar syndrome or lung abscess[3, 4]. Demonstration of a systemic arterial supply is the key diagnostic feature. Lesions are often hypervascular due to systemic perfusion (also noted in this case), and superimposed infection may produce adjacent consolidation or inflammatory neovascularization[3]. 

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was traditionally the preferred modality for demonstrating pulmonary sequestration and its anomalous systemic arterial supply[3, 4]. However, CE-MDCT now offers accurate, non-invasive vascular evaluation[3]. CE-MRI provides a reasonable alternative, but its limited assessment of lung parenchyma and airways, along with higher cost and reduced availability remain important considerations[3]. In our case, CE-MDCT with 3D multiplanar reconstructions (3D-MPR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) imaging techniques were sufficient for the diagnosis and for defining key anatomic features relevant to surgical planning.

Conclusion

In elderly patients, pulmonary sequestration may remain clinically silent; or it can present with recurrent infections or radiological features that closely mimic pulmonary malignancy. So, the accurate imaging diagnosis is crucial, particularly in this age group. Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (CE-MDCT) has now emerged as a reliable, non-invasive alternative to the traditional diagnostic modalities, allowing precise delineation of the anomalous vascular supply. Also, it enables concurrent assessment of anomalous vessels and lung parenchymal lesions, making it a highly effective technique with strong potential to become the diagnostic method of choice for pulmonary sequestration.

Disclosure

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. 

Funding: None of the authors received outside funding for the production of this original manuscript and no part of this article has been previously published elsewhere.

Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank Dr Nitish Kumar, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India for facilitating data collection and access to patient.